top of page
Copy of Copy of 235 (2).png

Policy

Policy directives for the 235 Movement

  1. Strategic Implementation – Section 235 must be used deliberately and legally as a lever for self-determination. This requires a clear plan for community engagement and international recognition.

  2. Collaboration and Consensus – Decision-making should be consensus-driven, rather than party politics. All involved should follow the principles of collaboration and shared vision.

  3. Transparency and Ethical Leadership – The movement must handle all financial and administrative matters transparently, with a high ethical standard to establish trust in the community.

  4. Economic Sustainability – A long-term plan for a self-governing economy must be developed, leveraging trade, banking, and resources to strengthen independence.

  5. Diplomatic Relations – The movement must strive for international recognition and cooperation with other self-determination movements worldwide.
    There must be outreach - We must involve other organizations that advocate self-determination as much as possible to broaden our support base.

Code of Conduct for Officials and Members

  1. Integrity and Honesty – All members and officials must act with the highest level of honesty and trustworthiness.

  2. Service and Duty – Leadership is a calling to service. Officials must act selflessly in the interest of the community and the greater good.

  3. Respect and Unity – All members must communicate with respect and professionalism, regardless of personal differences.

  4. Non-Party Political Involvement – The movement must offer an alternative to traditional party politics and instead strive for merit-based leadership.

  5. Accountability – All officials must be held accountable for their actions and decisions, with clear processes for accountability and corrective action.

Public Communication and Media Engagement

  1. Responsible Public Statements – All officials must choose their words carefully and avoid any statements that could sow division.

  2. Fact-Based Communication – All statements must be based on proven facts, with clear references to legal and historical sources.

  3. Protection of the Movement's Integrity – No member may unnecessarily involve the movement in controversy or undermine its goals through undocumented statements.

  4. Proactive Media Strategy – An integrated plan for media engagement must be developed, including article publications, interviews, and community awareness.

  5. Uniform and Professional Communication – All public statements must be consistent with the policies and values of the movement.

Conflict Management and Internal Discipline

  1. Vrede en Eenheid as Kernbeginsels – Die beweging moet daarop gemik wees om    interne en eksterne konflikte vreedsaam op te los.

  2. Duidelike Interne Klagsisteme – Lede moet ‘n gedefinieerde pad hê om klagtes of besware te bring sonder dat dit tot interne verdeeldheid lei.

  3. Nie Aggressiewe Respons op Teenkanting – Kritiek moet rasioneel en professio-       neel hanteer word, sonder emosionele reaksies wat die beweging kan benadeel.

  4. Aanspreeklikheid en Regstelling – As ‘n lid of amptenaar die gedragskode oortree, moet daar ‘n deursigtige proses wees vir aanspreeklikheid en regstelling.

  5. Bemiddelingsproses – ‘n Gestruktureerde benadering tot konflikbemiddeling moet gedefinieer word, met neutrale individue wat help om oplossings te vind.

Conflict Management and Internal Discipline

  1. Onafhanklike Bemiddelingspaneel – ‘n Komitee van gerespekteerde lede moet       aangewys word om as neutrale bemiddelaars op te tree in geval van interne konflik.

  2. Stapsgewyse Konflikhantering

    • Eerste vlak: Direkte gesprek tussen betrokkenes om ‘n vreedsame oplossing te vind.

    • Tweede vlak: Bemiddeling deur ‘n neutrale lid binne die beweging.

    • Derde vlak: Indien nodig, ‘n formele paneelbespreking met ‘n aanbeveling vir die regstelling van gedrag.

  3. Diskresie en Vertroulikheid – Alle bemiddelingsprosesse moet met die nodige ver-troulikheid en respek hanteer word om reputasies te beskerm.

  4. Geen Openbare Persoonlike Beskuldigings – Konflikte moet intern opgelos word    en nie op ‘n openbare forum bespreek word nie, om verdeeldheid te voorkom.

  5. Rekordhouding en Verantwoording – Alle konfliksake en bemiddelingsbesluite       moet dokumenteer word vir deursigtigheid en toekomstige verwysing.

Correction System for Violations

  1. Warning and Correction – Upon a first offense, the member concerned receives a private warning and an opportunity to correct the behavior.

  2. Structured Correction – If behavior continues, a structured re-adjustment process may begin, including training or a public correction statement.

  3. Temporary Suspension – In the event of serious violations, temporary suspension may be applied to protect the integrity of the movement.

  4. Removal and Discretion – If a member consistently harms the movement's goals, a final decision can be made for removal from formal roles, using a diplomatic approach.

  5. Review Board – Members who feel they have been treated unfairly can request a review of the matter by a neutral board.

Correction System for Violations

  1. Warning and Correction – Upon a first offense, the member concerned receives a private warning and an opportunity to correct the behavior.

  2. Structured Correction – If behavior continues, a structured re-adjustment process may begin, including training or a public correction statement.

  3. Temporary Suspension – In the event of serious violations, temporary suspension may be applied to protect the integrity of the movement.

  4. Removal and Discretion – If a member consistently harms the movement's goals, a final decision can be made for removal from formal roles, using a diplomatic approach.

  5. Review Board – Members who feel they have been treated unfairly can request a review of the matter by a neutral board.

Conflict with Government Agencies over Section 235

  1. Diplomatic Response as First Step – All disputes should first be approached with a professional and diplomatic approach. Polite and factual communication should be ensured.

  2. Formal Negotiation and Collaboration – If possible, an opportunity should be sought for discussion and negotiation to find common ground.

  3. Legal Framework as Basis – Article 235 should still serve as the legal basis in all inter-sectoral disputes, and the movement should consult legal experts to follow a lawful path.

  4. Public Statement and Strategic Communication – If an external entity attempts to discredit the movement, a well-considered public response must be prepared that emphasizes facts and legal principles.

  5. International Networks as a Support Base – Global networks of self-determination movements and legal institutions must be harnessed to strengthen diplomatic and moral support.

  6. Non-Confrontational Mediation Where Possible – If the dispute does not pose a direct threat, mediation by a neutral third party should be considered.

  7. Legal Action as a Last Resort – If all other efforts fail, the movement may consider launching an official legal case or constitutional appeal.

Conflict with Government Agencies over Section 235

  1. Diplomatic Response as First Step – All disputes should first be approached with a professional and diplomatic approach. Polite and factual communication should be ensured.

  2. Formal Negotiation and Collaboration – If possible, an opportunity should be sought for discussion and negotiation to find common ground.

  3. Legal Framework as Basis – Article 235 should still serve as the legal basis in all inter-sectoral disputes, and the movement should consult legal experts to follow a lawful path.

  4. Public Statement and Strategic Communication – If an external entity attempts to discredit the movement, a well-considered public response must be prepared that emphasizes facts and legal principles.

  5. International Networks as a Support Base – Global networks of self-determination movements and legal institutions must be harnessed to strengthen diplomatic and moral support.

  6. Non-Confrontational Mediation Where Possible – If the dispute does not pose a direct threat, mediation by a neutral third party should be considered.

  7. Legal Action as a Last Resort – If all other efforts fail, the movement may consider launching an official legal case or constitutional appeal.

Conflict with Government Agencies over Section 235

  1. Diplomatic Response as First Step – All disputes should first be approached with a professional and diplomatic approach. Polite and factual communication should be ensured.

  2. Formal Negotiation and Collaboration – If possible, an opportunity should be sought for discussion and negotiation to find common ground.

  3. Legal Framework as Basis – Article 235 should still serve as the legal basis in all inter-sectoral disputes, and the movement should consult legal experts to follow a lawful path.

  4. Public Statement and Strategic Communication – If an external entity attempts to discredit the movement, a well-considered public response must be prepared that emphasizes facts and legal principles.

  5. International Networks as a Support Base – Global networks of self-determination movements and legal institutions must be harnessed to strengthen diplomatic and moral support.

  6. Non-Confrontational Mediation Where Possible – If the dispute does not pose a direct threat, mediation by a neutral third party should be considered.

  7. Legal Action as a Last Resort – If all other efforts fail, the movement may consider launching an official legal case or constitutional appeal.

Conflict with Government Agencies over Section 235

  1. Diplomatic Response as First Step – All disputes should first be approached with a professional and diplomatic approach. Polite and factual communication should be ensured.

  2. Formal Negotiation and Collaboration – If possible, an opportunity should be sought for discussion and negotiation to find common ground.

  3. Legal Framework as Basis – Article 235 should still serve as the legal basis in all inter-sectoral disputes, and the movement should consult legal experts to follow a lawful path.

  4. Public Statement and Strategic Communication – If an external entity attempts to discredit the movement, a well-considered public response must be prepared that emphasizes facts and legal principles.

  5. International Networks as a Support Base – Global networks of self-determination movements and legal institutions must be harnessed to strengthen diplomatic and moral support.

  6. Non-Confrontational Mediation Where Possible – If the dispute does not pose a direct threat, mediation by a neutral third party should be considered.

  7. Legal Action as a Last Resort – If all other efforts fail, the movement may consider launching an official legal case or constitutional appeal.

Conflict with Government Agencies over Section 235

  1. Diplomatic Response as First Step – All disputes should first be approached with a professional and diplomatic approach. Polite and factual communication should be ensured.

  2. Formal Negotiation and Collaboration – If possible, an opportunity should be sought for discussion and negotiation to find common ground.

  3. Legal Framework as Basis – Article 235 should still serve as the legal basis in all inter-sectoral disputes, and the movement should consult legal experts to follow a lawful path.

  4. Public Statement and Strategic Communication – If an external entity attempts to discredit the movement, a well-considered public response must be prepared that emphasizes facts and legal principles.

  5. International Networks as a Support Base – Global networks of self-determination movements and legal institutions must be harnessed to strengthen diplomatic and moral support.

  6. Non-Confrontational Mediation Where Possible – If the dispute does not pose a direct threat, mediation by a neutral third party should be considered.

  7. Legal Action as a Last Resort – If all other efforts fail, the movement may consider launching an official legal case or constitutional appeal.

bottom of page